Internal Investigations
The second type of investigation into a conflict could be categorised under the "internal" investigation umbrella, where the person initiating the investigation enjoys some level of control over an alleged culprit. This would typically come about in cases where a worker is alleged to have engaged in wrongdoing and the employer or government body who employs the worker decides to conduct an investigation. Often a whistleblower is involved. In this type of investigation the investigator has not only the options mentioned above but may also have additional investigative avenues to explore. For example, an employer looking into claims an employee improperly favoured one supplier over another may have access to relevant digital evidence (such as emails and smartphone metadata), documentary evidence and/or witnesses who can provide statements.
In cases involving governments officials, FOI requests may be contemplated.
Self-evidently, an internal investigation is usually more straightforward as there is usually access to more evidence. Direct evidence of wrongdoing will often lead to serious consequences and possibly to civil action or even to criminal charges. If evidence of an improper relationship alone is uncovered in an internal or external investigation, it may be sufficient for a contract to be rescinded (or otherwise unwound) or may lead to a broader review of the circumstances.
As with any type of investigation, for reasons of efficiency and effectiveness, it is optimal if one primary investigator manages the conduct of a conflict matter as a whole. One never knows where an investigation will end.
Lyonswood Investigations & Forensics is a firm with 36 years of broad-based investigation experience. We are skilled in background checks, surveillance, factual investigations, digital forensics and all the elements involved in conducting corruption, collusion and conflict of interest investigations.